HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4384 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Shri Pramod Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and 3 - Indian Oil Corporation Limited is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. October 8, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Yadav, Rajesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : D.S.P. Singh, Mrs Sushma Devi, Pramod Kumar Rai, Shri Prakash Padia (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Raj Kumar Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru Secretary And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad