BHARTI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/3565/2025 · 2025-04-08
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44824 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44824 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
151 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-3565-2025 Date of Decision:08.04.2025 BHARTI DEVI AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Sony, Advocate for Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL
, J.
(Oral)
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Contitution of India for directing official respondent nos. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 5 to 7.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 06.04.2025 (Annexure P-5), within a time bound manner. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the State. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Karnal, to look into the representation dated 06.04.2025 (Annexure P-5) and decide in light of notification No.12/252/2023-4HG-IV, dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, Government of Haryana, within a period of three days from today itself.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 08.04.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.04.10 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh