SHAH NAWAZ v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY CULTURE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2235/2024 · 2025-08-30
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4482 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4482 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 34
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2235/2024
Shah Nawaz
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. F A Natnoo Advocate.
V/s
UT of J&K & Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Adarsh Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
30.08.2025
Short grievance projected by the petitioner is that he has worked for the higher post and he would be entitled charge allowances which has not been granted to him. He has relied upon Rule 85 1(5), entitled to charge of in terms of provisions contained in Chapter VIII of Combination of Appointments and salaries Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations Volume 1 related to salary, leave, pension and travelling allowances.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner's case will be considered and, if found eligible, the admissible charge allowances will be released in his favour.
In view of the submissions made, the present petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with the applicable rules, particularly Chapter VIII of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services Regulations Volume I. Let the claim of the petitioner be considered and decision in
__________
this regard be taken and communicated to the petitioner within a period of two months from the data copy of the order is served upon them by the petitioner.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul)
Judge
Jammu:
30.08.2025 AMIT