Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44818 (MAD)

M.SWAMINATHAN AND 4 OTHERS v. K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN AND 3 OTHERS

(T)(TM) A/2/2025 · 2025-06-17

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY (T)(TM)A.No.2 of 2025 in (T)OP(TM) No. 144 of 2023 1. M.Swaminathan, Partner of M/s. Process Specialties, No.32-33, Spartan Avenue, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Mogappair, Chennai – 600050. 2. Propel Valves Pvt. Limited, Now at 32-33, Spartan Avenue, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Mogappair, Chennai – 600050. ... Applicants vs. 1. K.G. Balasubramanian, Partner of M/s. Process Specialities, Residing at No.3, 2nd West Cross Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore, Tamil Nadu. 2. Mechano Engineering Works by Propx Kamala Balasubramanian, w/o.Balasubramanian S.F.No.145/3, Madam Street, Kangeyanallur Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore-632 006. 3.Sriram Industries by Prop. B.Sriram, S/o. Balasubramanian, S.F.No.3/54, Madam Street, Kangeyanallur Village, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore-632 006. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4. SMK Combines by Propx Ms Prabha Devi, W/o. Swaminathan, 32-33, Spartan Avenue, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Mogappair, Chennai – 600050. ... Respondents Prayer : Application is filed to take on record the further evidence filed herewith as additional evidence on the side of the applicants. For Applicants : Mr.Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar for Mr.M.S.Sampath ORDER This application has been filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents in the rectification petition seeking permission to file the additional documents referred to in the affidavit. The pleadings are complete, but the trial has not commenced. 2. Learned counsel for the contesting respondents has no objections to this application being allowed subject to the right of the contesting respondents to raise objections in course of trial. 3. Upon examining the reasons set out in the affidavit and being 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis satisfied that reasonable cause is shown, this application is allowed subject to the right of the contesting respondents to file an affidavit of admission / denial in respect thereof and raise objections, inter alia, on the grounds of admissibility, relevance and proof in course of trial. 17.06.2025 kj (2/3) 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kj (T)(TM)A.No.2 of 2025 in (T)OP(TM) No. 144 of 2023 17.06.2025 (2/3) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis