241 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19626-2025 Date of Decision: 01.05.2025 Sanjeet …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant regular bail in case FIR No.313, dated 14.10.2024 registered under Sections 191(3), 190, 115(2), 118(1), 110, 351(2), 126(2) of BNS, at Police Station Sadar Dadri, District Charkhi Dadri (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been named in the FIR due to party fraction in the village and it has been wrongly alleged that he along with his co-accused had attacked the complainant side with iron rod, lathis and dandas. He further contends that Suraj, complainant had suffered an injury on his head in the occurrence, however, all injuries suffered by Suraj have been declared to be simple in nature. The petitioner was arrested in the present case on 22.10.2024 and his case at par with Subhash, co-accused, who has already been granted the concession of bail by this Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P-4). HITESH 2025.05.01 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-19626-2025 -2 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that serious allegations have been levelled against the present petitioner and he does not deserve the concession of bail by this Court. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. It is not in dispute that all the injuries suffered by Suraj have been declared to be simple in nature. The petitioner is stated to be in custody for the last more than 06 months and the challan has already been presented against him. Apart from that, similarly placed co-accused namely Subhash has already been granted the concession of bail by this Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P-4). 6. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Chief Judicial Magistrate, concerned. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 01.05.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.05.01 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh