[2025:RJ-JP:21402-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1738/2023 1. Suresh Kumar Rathi Son Of Arjun Singh Rathi, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Village Narayanpur, District Alwar. 2. Narendra Singh Son Of Bakshi Singh, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Dhani Hari Singh Ki Johard, Tan Narayanpur, District Alwar. 3. Ravi Solanki Son Of Umrao Lal, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Narayanpur, District Alwar. 4. Dinesh Kumar Bhargava Son Of Banwari Lal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Narayanpur, District Alwar. 5. Akash Agarwal Son Of Shri Naresh Agarwal, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Village Narayanpur,tehsil Narayanpur, District Alwar. 6. Rajesh Kumar Saini Son Of Shri Sooraj Mal, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Dhani Badwali, Tehsil Narayanpur, District Alwar. 7. Dhudharam Son Of Kanhayalal, R/o Narayanpur, Mordi Ki Dhani, Narayanpur, District Alwar ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. The Collector, Alwar. 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division Narayanpur District Alwar. 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Narayanpur, District Alwar. 5. 6. Gram Panchayat Narayanpur, Tehsil Narayanpur, District Alwar. Vikram Singh, Son of Jai Ram Gurjar, resident of Gyan Singh Ki Dhani, Tehsil Narayanpur, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. T.C. Sharma [2025:RJ-JP:21402-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-1738/2023] Ms. Shikha Sharma for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/05/2025 1. By this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for removing of the encroachments from the land which is recorded in the revenue record as ‘Gair Mumkin Nadi’. 2. According to the petitioners themselves, the conversion of abadi land has been made by the State Government for the land in dispute in the year 1975 and thereafter, the respondent No.6 is having lawful possession over the land in dispute. 3. We have considered the record. 4. The petitioners have challenged the conversion of land which was made in the year 1975 after a delay of 47 years. 5. In that view of the matter, in our considered view no case is made for interference by this Court under this public interest litigation writ petition. 6. Hence, this writ petition stands dismissed. 7. Pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J DIVYA /111