(1) 37.37ACP333.328.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.333/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2248/2021 (D) Laxman Chirkutrao Patil & Ors..Vs.Shri Sanjay Meena, Chairman, NIT Nagpur & Ors. AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO.328/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2352/2021 (D) Bhimrao Maniramji Kakde & Ors..Vs.Shri Sanjay Meena, Chairman,NIT Nagpur & Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mrs. Swati K. Paunikar, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. G. A. Kunte, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2026. Heard. 2. The order of which contempt is sought, particularly operative portion of the order reads as under: 6. Since this position involves disputed questions of fact, we are not inclined to go into that, we however dispose of these Petitions by directing the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to examine the plea as raised above vis-a- vis the Petitioners, in light of the revised layout sanctioned map dated 02.01.2006 In case, it is found that the plots of the Petitioners are affected by the DP road, there is no question of granting any release letter to those Petitioners. Only those Petitioners whose lands are not affected or partially affected by the 36 meter DP road, would be entitled for consideration of their pleas of release of the land to the extent of the individual plots which is not so affected by the DP road reservation.” 3. As could be seen, by the aforesaid order, the Court refrained itself from going into merits of the case but directed the respondents to examine plea raised by petitioners as regards the plots being affected by the alleged DP road. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the documents have been sought from the petitioners which are not yet (2) 37.37ACP333.328.25 supplied. He submits that the process of examining the issue has been initiated and will be completed within four weeks. 5. The statement is accepted as an undertaking to the Court. Compliance report shall be filed within four weeks. 6. With this, we dispose of the petition. Even otherwise, we do not find from the pleadings or otherwise that the respondents have disobeyed muchless willfully disobeyed the order. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale Signed by: Kahale Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 08/09/2026 19:38:39