APHC010032742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1772/2025 Between: 1. JALIPARTHY HONEY CHOUDARY, W/O GUNTUPALLI CHANDRAMOULI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O TATAKUNTIA VILLAGE, VISSANNAPETA MANDAL PRESENT NTR DISTRICT. OLD KRISHNA DISTRICT-AP. 2. GUNTUPALLI SAANVI NYRA,, D/O CHANDRAMOULI, AGED ABOUT 02 YEARS., BEING MINOR REP. BY NATURAL MOTHER GUARDIAN I.E., ABOVE FIRST PETITIONER NAMED JALIPARTHI HONEY CHOWDARY R/O TATAKUNTIA VILLAGE, VISSANNAPETA MANDAL, PRESENT NTR DISTRICT, OLD KRISHNA DISTRICT-AP. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETATIAT BULDINGS. VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHIANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VISANNAPETA POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE CIRCLEINSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVURU-TIRUVURU MANDA NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA- NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. GUNTUPALLI CHANDRAMOULI, S/O SIVA SANKARARAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. SOFTWARE ENGINEER IN AMAZON COMPANY IN SEATTLE, USA, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.4-339/1, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, SOUTHERN SIDE OF LAKSHMI NARASIMHASWAMY TEMPLE, NALLAPADU, GUNTURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. TAGORE YADAV YARAGORLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 2. VARUN BYREDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ order or direction declaring the inactions of the Respondent authorities in not commencing any investigation on the Petitioners Application cum complaint, which had submitted to the sub-inspector of police, Visannapeta police station to take action against 5th Respondent for illegally retaining the Deceptively, with an intention to harass the petitioners, and had kept the educational certificates, passport of 2nd Petitioner and medical reports, personal belongings of the 1st petitioner which are in custody of 5th Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 21, of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to surrender/handover the Passport and other original certificates of the Petitioners” 2. Heard Sri Tagore Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they have not received any representation from the petitioners to attend their cause. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to make a representation to the police to attend to their cause, or they can file a fresh petition to serve the purpose of obtaining the passport of their child, which is in the custody. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:04.09.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.1772 of 2025 Dt.04.09.2025 Asr