IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE j PRESENT ( THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 14fi0 QF 2018 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein of the orders passed by this Honourable dated 10-10-2017. AMARAVATI Act 1971 for willfull violation court in W.P. No. 33560 of 2017 BETWEEN:- Smt. A. Lakshmi Bai„ residing at Flat No. F-2, Kumar Apartments Jagannadharaju Nagar, Visakhapatnam 530 022. ...PETITIONER aged about 42 years, Joint Office, Maharanipeta, AND 1. G. Srujana,, W/o not known to the Petitioner Collector, Urban Land Ceiling, Collectors Visakhapatnam 530 002. 2. Sri. M. Nagabushana Rao, S/o not known to the Petitioner, Tahsildar Maddelapalem,Visakhapatnam District. ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2nift Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to Tahsildar, Maddelapalem, Visakhapatnam, the 2 remove the Board put up by the nd Respondent herein in Plot No. 13 of T.P.No.35/70, Lay Out in R.S.No.22 of Venkojipalem, Maddelapalem Village, Visakhapatnam District as approved by the Director Town and Country Pianning, Government of A.P.. pending disposai of the above Contempt Case. Counsel for the Petitioner:-SRI. T.S. ANAND Counsel for the Respondents: - GP FOR ASSISGNMENT The Court made the following: APHC010390102018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1460/2018 Between: ...PETITIONER Smt. A’: Lakshmi Bai, AND ...CONTEMNOR(S) G Srujana and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.TS ANAND Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. I \ The Court made the following: ORDER The above contempt case is filed complaining non-implementation of the order dated 10.10.2017 in W.P.No.33560 of 2017. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of respondents in removing the Board put up in Plot No.13 of T.P.No.35/70 in j R.S.No.22 of Maddilapalem village, Visakhapatnam, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. / The said writ petition Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam to ventilated in the representation dated 02.03.2017 orders. The Court further directed the authority to take decision in 6 weeks. Complaining non-implementation of the contempt case is filed. ,5. was disposed of directing the Joint Collector, i examine the claim of the petitioner as and pass appropriate 4. said order, the present 5. Sri Bhagat Singh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents submitted the proceedings issued by the Joint Collector Competent Authority, Rc.No.273/2023/SA/ dated 17.08.2024. & Urban Land Ceiling Visakhapatnam vide The Joint Collector passed a speaking order and communicated the same to the petitioner. A notarized affidavit of the petitioner was also filed. 6. Since a speaking order was passed and affidavit of the petitioner is also filed, this Court does not find any violation of the order dated 10.10.2017 in W.P.No.33560of 2017. 7. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is Closed. No costs. As pending miscellaneous.petitions, if any, shall stand closed. a sequel / SOI- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// I V SECTION OFFICER To, 1. G. Srujana, W/o not known to the Petitioner, aged about 42 Collector, Urban Land Ceiling, Collectors Office Visakhapatnam 530 002. 2. Sri. M. Nagabushana Rao, S/o not known to the Petitioner, Maddelapalem, Visakhapatnam District. 3. One CC to Sri. T.S. Anand, Advocate. [OPUC] 4. Two CCS to G.P for Assignment, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 5. Three C.D Copies. years. Joint Maharanipeta, Tahsildar, Ssl PRK HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER CC.NO.1460 OF 2018 S( 2 5JUL20?5 )g ^^sburrent Section^* '■^SS CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS