SUBHASH CHANDRA S/O SHRI PURAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16786/2025 · 2025-11-04
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44801 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44801 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44354] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16786/2025 Subhash Chandra S/o Shri Puran Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Kailash Nagar Piprali Road, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Rulyana Patti District Sikar.
4. Surendra Singh, Principal, Shaheed Deputy Commandant Vijaypal Singh Govt. Senior Secondary School, Gagadwas District Churu. ----Respondents And S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16787/2025 Sulochana Kumari W/o Shri Subhash Chand, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Kialash Nagar Piprali Road, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Gokulpura District Sikar.
4. Raj Sharma, Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Gokulpura, District Sikar. ----Respondents And S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16788/2025 Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Purna Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Nawalgarh Road Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
[2025:RJ-JP:44354] (2 of 4) [CW-16786/2025]
3. The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Rulyana Mali District Sikar.
4. Jaibir Singh, Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Rulyana Mali District Sikar. ----Respondents And S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16789/2025 Kiran W/o Shri Surendra Kumar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Nawalgarh Road Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Suthoth District Sikar.
4. Subhash Chandra, Principal, Shaheed Rajkumar Govt. Senior Secondary School, Bhainsali District Churu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sandeep Kalwaniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar and Ms. Pooja Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 04/11/2025
1. All these matters are connected in the manner that they raise a common question that husband and wife, if in Government service, should be posted at same place, as a matter of State policy.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that by impugned order, the petitioners are transferred not only at
[2025:RJ-JP:44354] (3 of 4) [CW-16786/2025] different Districts but at distant locations which has resulted into forceful separation with his/her spouse and it is impossible for him/her to lead marital life. He submits that as per transfer policy, the husband and wife should be posted at same place and this policy has been adopted by almost all the administrative departments.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG submits that the Department will consider the representation, if any submitted by the petitioner(s), and they will make an endeavour to post the husband and wife within same District or at any convenient location.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner(s) are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner(s) either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner(s) have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioner(s) are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. In the meanwhile, impugned transfer order dated 22.09.2025 and also consequential relieving order qua the present petitioner(s) shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation, by the respondent Authority.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition(s) with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
[2025:RJ-JP:44354] (4 of 4) [CW-16786/2025]
7. A copy of this order be placed in each file separately.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/197 to 200