Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44800 (RAJ)

SANTOSH CHINAK GUPTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9822/2025 · 2025-10-06

Sameer Jain

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44338] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9821/2025 Jaydeep S/o Shri Vijubhai, R/o B-310, Jaysaai Jay Bhawani Kebin Crossing Road, Near Saraswati School, Bhayander East, District Thane, Maharashtra. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chand Katara For State For Complainant : : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Choudhary, SPP, CBI Mr. Nisheeth Dixit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 04/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant in connection with FIR No. 03/2024 registered at Cyber Police Station (Jhunjhunu) District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 384, 420, 406, 388 IPC and Section 66-D of IT (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is sole breadearner for his family and is a young man. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant and he has been falsely implicated in the instant matter. Further, it is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and one of co-accused-Santosh has already been granted benefit of regular bail vide order dated 18.09.2025 by Coordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that matter is triable by Magistrate. [2025:RJ-JP:44338] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9821/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for he complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that matter pertains to organized cyber crime. In this regard, learned counsel for the complainant has relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Criminal) No(s). 3/2025 in Re: Victims of Digital Arrest related to Forged Documents, and Sandeep alias sonu v. State of Government of NCT of Delhi: SLP (Crl.) No. 18192/2024. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the offence at hand shall have a writ large effect and have severe repercussions qua the society; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicants. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /247