- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4296 RSA No. 2946 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2946 OF 2007 (PAR-) BETWEEN: 1. CHIDANANDA S/O. RAMAPPA GOKAVI, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST AND EX-SERVICEMAN, 2. NIRVANAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA GOKAVI, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST AND MEDICAL PRACTIONER, 3. SMT. GOURAVVA W/O. BHIMAGOWDA PATIL, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, ALL ARE RESIDING AT PARAKANAHATTI VILLAGE, HUKKERI TALUK, BELGAUM DISTRICT-591107. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. S.N. HATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VITHAL, S/O. RAMAPPA GOKAVI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, 2. SRI. NIJALINGA, S/O. RAMAPPA GOKAVI, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT: PARAKANAHATTI VILLAGE, HUKKERI TALUK, BELGAUM DISTRICT-591107. Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.03.07 16:18:45 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4296 RSA No. 2946 of 2007 3. SRI. ANANDA S/O. RAMAPPA GOKAVI, AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PROP: BASAVA MEDICAL STORES, MALI ALLI, BELGAUM-590002. 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HIRANYAKESI SAKKARE KHARKHANE NIYAMITHA, SANKESWARA-591313, BELGAUM DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.P. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) HUKKERI AT HUKKERI IN R.A.NO.80/2005 DATED 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2007 AND ALSO CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AT HUKKERI IN O.S.NO.54/2004 DATED 26.09.2005 AND ALSO ALLOW THE ABOVE SAID APPEAL WITH COST AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH) None appears for the appellants. The matter called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session; however, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Same - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4296 RSA No. 2946 of 2007 would indicate that, appellants are not interested to prosecute the appeal. Taking into consideration that appeal is of the year 2007 and on account of non-appearance of the advocate on behalf of the appellants, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41