Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44797 (KAR)

SRI G NAGANDRAPPA S/O GANIBASAPPA v. SRI R VADIRAJA RAO S/O GURURAJA RAO

RSA/2652/2007 · 2025-03-04

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 04TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO 2652/2007 (SP) BETWEEN: SRI G NAGENDRAPPA S/O GANIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/O BAGALI VILLAGE HARAPANAHALLI TALUK BALLARI DISTRICT ... APPELLANT (By SRI. : GANGADHAR S. HOSAKERI, ADVOCATE) AND 1 . SRI R VADIRAJA RAO S/O GURURAJA RAO AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT KUDLIGI TOWN MAIN ROAD KUDLIGI TALUK BALLARI DISTRICT 2 . SRI R SANDEEP S/O R VADIRAJA RAO AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT KUDLIGI TOWN MAIN ROAD KUDLIGI TALUK BALLARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE) 2 RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.06.2007 PASSED IN R.A.NO.53/06 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) HARIHAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.09.2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.110/01 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, (JR.DN) AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI. TRIAL COURT DECREED THE SUIT. APPELLATE COURT ALLOWED THE APPEAL. SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT AND CONSEQUENTIAL RELEIF OF INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R No representation on behalf of the appellant Finally, one week time is granted to remove the office objections, failing which the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 15.05.2025. Advocate for the appellant has not done the needful. Hence, this RSA No. 2652/2007 is dismissed without reference to the Bench as per the Court Order dated 04/03/2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T- By: -ran