5, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 446 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 19-09-2024 in W.P.No.9110 of 2021 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh,, represented by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department Secretariat building at Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Commissioner and Director of College Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Office at Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Regional Joint Director, Intermediate Education, Office at Arts College Campus at Rajahmahendravaram East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. 3. ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS AND Mr.Kollu Sreemannarayana, S/o Uthayya, aged 36 years, Occ. Un aided Junior Lecturer in English M.S.N. Junior College (Aided), Kakinada East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 1. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER The Correspondent, M.S.N. Junior College (Aided) Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be r pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated: 19-09-2024 in "W.P.9110 of 2021, pending disposal the Writ Appeal and set aside the orders dated 19-09-2024 in W.P.No.9110 of 2021 in the interest of justice and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Appellants: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.t: SRI K. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI T. BALAJI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APHC010020102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT APPEAL No: 446/2025 Between: The State of Andhra Pradesh, and others AND Mr. Kollu Sreemannarayana and others ...APPELLANT(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.TBALAJI 2. The Court made the following: ( 2 JUDGMENTr (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education, appearing for the appellants. K.Satyanarayana Murthy, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1-writ petitioner. Also heard Mr. 2. At the time of considering the matter, it is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that in Similar circumstances, a Division Bench of this Court, after recording the submissions made on behalf of learned counsel on both sides, opined that the State has to consider the case of the each employee duly taking into account their terms of appointment etc., and disposed of a batch of writ appeals vide W.A.No.1193 of 2023, etc., by an order dated 23.08.2024. The relevant portion of which reads as follows: 11. “... The case of each of the respondent/employees has to be considered individually on merits and appropriate orders must be passed against each of the employee. There cannot be an omnibus consideration of the cases of the respondents and it is not expected that the State shall pass an omnibus order in the cases of all similarly placed employees who are seeking regularization. The State has to consider each case of the employee duly taking into account their terms of employment and whether the private colleges have followed the procedure \ ■\ <h stipu<ated under the GO for selecting the respondents. The State ought to also consider the terms and conditions of employment before passing the detailed order. The respondents shall submit individual applicatiops to the appellants within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The respondents shall also submit the relevant annexUres, such as, the appointment letter service record if any available with the respondents and any other documents relating to their claim for absorption into aided posts. 12. The appellants shall pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of 8 (eight) weeks after receipt of such representation s from the respondents. With these observations the writ appeals are disposed of, without costs." 3. The learned counsel for the respondents has not disputed the said orders. In the light of the submissions made, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Appeal on similar lines, leaving it open to the respondent/writ petitioner to make an application to the appellants, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, along with the relevant annexures. On receipt of such representation/application, the appellants shall pass appropriate orders preferably, within a period of eight (08) weeks thereafter. With the above observation, the Writ Appeal is disposed of. No 4. costs. i 4 As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, M.S.N. Junior College (Aided) Kakinada, East 1. The Correspondent Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. CC to Sri K. Satyanarayana Murthy, Advocate[OPUC] 2. One 3. One CC to Sri T. Balaji, Advocate[OPUC] to GP for Higher Education, High Court of Andhra 4. Two CC’s Pradesh[OUT] 5. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:22/04/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.446 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS