Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4479 (RAJ)

MANOJ KUMAR SON OF SHRI RAMCHANDRA MEENA v. AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/1195/2025 · 2025-02-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4553] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1195/2025 Manoj Kumar Son Of Shri Ramchandra Meena, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Village And Post Tiba Basai, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali Road, Ajmer (Raj.) Through Its Managing Director. 2. Secretary (Administration), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali Road, Ajmer (Raj.) 3. Assistant Engineer (Rural), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Khetri Town, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swaraj Panwar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 03/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with a liberty to file a representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority. In the facts and circumstances, relying upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, this Court directs the respondent-Department that the representation filed by the petitioner (within fifteen days from the date of passing of this order) be decided in accordance with law, [2025:RJ-JP:4553] (2 of 2) [CW-1195/2025] by way of a speaking order, pronto. The respondent-Department will be at liberty to pass any further order(s) considering the administrative exigencies, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/166