Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4479 (JHR)

SUSHIL KUMAR SOREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/2270/2025 · 2025-05-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13853 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2270 of 2025 ---------- Sushil Kumar Soren, son of Prem Pyare Soren, aged about 44 years, R/o. Kamdhaha, Bhagiya, P.O. Sahebganj, P.S. Sahebganj, District Sahebganj, Jharkhand-813208. ………. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Chief Secretary of Jharkhand, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. + P.S.+ District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj, P.O. Sahebganj, P.S. Sahebganj, District Sahebganj, Jharkhand. 4. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sahebganj, P.O. Sahebganj, P.S. Sahebganj, District Sahebganj, Jharkhand. 5. The Circle Officer, Rajmahal, P.O.+P.S.+District Sahebganj. 6. The District Supply Officer, Sahebganj-cum-District Manager, Jharkhand State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Sahebganj, P.O.+P.S.+District Sahebganj, Jharkhand. 7. The Block Development Officer, Rajmahal, P.O.+P.S.+ District Sahebganj, Jharkhand. ………. Respondents. ---------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Toppo, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC(M)-III Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Advocate ---------- 02/ 08.05.2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that in view of the development, the instant application may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate steps before the appropriate forum. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection. 3. Having regard to the fair submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application stands disposed of with the liberty as sought by the petitioner. 4. Pending I.As, if any, stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-