IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11091 of 2025 Date of Decision: 01.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ M/s NDN Constructions …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned Senior counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that on account of subsequent development, whereby the petitioner has received the entire payment, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, petitioner would be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any, (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 01,2026 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?