HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 43220 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, it has been informed that learned counsel for the petitioners is no more. Learned Standing Counsel for the State is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feel that the matter survives, liberty is granted to her to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 23, 2025 A.K.Srivastava Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mool Behari Saxena Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Durgawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad