IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) ^ | TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10105 OF 2025 Between; Mopati Chandrasekhar Reddy, S/o. Sundara Rami Reddy aged about ^^years, R/o. D.No.6-5-165, Pitchireddythopu, Naidupeta, Tirupati ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The Tahsildar, Chillakur Mandal Chillakur, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent i . not issuing the IB (ROR) Form with digital signature in respect of the land in Sy.No.805/2-1 to an extent of Ac.6.50cts of Kadivedu village as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3 may one in the in rd respondent to update the webland records and issue 1B (ROR) Form with digital signature to the petitioner in respect of the above said land. lA NO; 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be 4 rd respondent to consider the representation pleased to direct the 3 dated:06-02-2025 submitted by the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010193982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10105/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Mopati Chandrasekhar Reddy AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PGANGARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10105/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- "to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3'^ respondent in not issuing the 1B (ROR) Form with digital signature In respect of the land in Sy. No. 805/2-1 to an extent of Ac. 6.50 cts of Kadivedu village as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3''^ respondent to update the webland records and Issue IB (ROR) Form with digital signature to the petitioner in respect of the above said land and pass such other order." 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 06.02.2025 submitted by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to consider the representation dated 06.02.2025 of the petitioner, if any pending with the respondents. 3 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh^ wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to consider the representation dated 06.02.2025 this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 06.02.2025 filed by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of six(6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed, j ^2019(8) SCALE 544 Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The Tahsildar, Chillakur Mandal Chillakur, Tirupati District. 4. One CC to Sri P Ganga Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies j? A \/r HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10105 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS