[2025:RJ-JP:47450] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17917/2025 Aditya Meena S/o Late Shri Mohan Singh Meena, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Near Pani Ki Tanki, Kota Road, Deoli, District Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director Department Of Medical And Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Tonk, Rajasthan. 4. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner referred order dated 13.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4735/2025 in case of Narendra Kumar Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed by this Court. 2. Issue notice to respondent(s). 3. Ms. Sweekriti Sharma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent(s). 4. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC as counsel for respondent(s). [2025:RJ-JP:47450] (2 of 3) [CW-17917/2025] 5. Learned counsel for petitioner is directed to serve him a copy of the petition. 6. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following prayers: “a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the Order dated 27.10.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner as per his qualification and eligibility from the date of furnishing application with all natural consequences. b) Any other order or direction, this Hon'ble Court may deem fit be also passed in favour of the petitioner. c) Cost of the writ petition may be awarded to the petitioner. 7. During course of argument, learned counsel for petitioner while relying upon judgment in case of Bharat Kumar Vs. Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10350/2016 decided on 07.03.2025 by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur submits that the candidature of petitioner was rejected only on the ground that candidate has filed an application after substantial delay for seeking compassionate appointment but except delay there is no other reason in rejection of his candidature for appointment. He further submits that a liberty be given to him to submit a detailed representation in light the ratio laid down by a Co-ordinate Bench in case of Bharat Kumar (supra) and the respondent(s) be directed to decide the direction in light of ratio laid down by this Hon’ble Court. 8. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- [2025:RJ-JP:47450] (3 of 3) [CW-17917/2025] Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 9. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /139