Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4478 (RAJ)

PRADEEP KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/O HANUMANARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1952/2025 · 2025-02-05

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1952/2025 Pradeep Kumar Choudhary S/o Hanumanaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 200, Dodwadiyon Ki Dhani, Village Alakhpura, Post Jhadod Tehsil Molasar, District Deedwana-Kuchaman, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 4. District Education Officer (Hqrs)., Elementary Education, Barmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RP Saini For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 05/02/2025 1. The petitioner was dismissed from service by the respondents vide order dated 02.08.2024 against which a statutory appeal under Rule 23 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 is pending before the Director Secondary Education, Bikaner. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction be issued to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal expeditiously as early as possible. (2 of 2) [CW-1952/2025] 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant petition stands disposed of by issuing directions to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after affording due opportunity of hearing to the respective parties. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction or passed any order to the Appellate Authority to decide the appeal in a particular way. The Appellate Authority is expected to decide the appeal strictly in accordance with law. 5. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/39