[2025:RJ-JP:43720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13123/2025 Smt. Teeja Devi W/o Late Shri Kalusingh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Samarthpura P.s. Pisangan District Ajmer. At Present In Central Jail Ajmer. ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Pradeep Sharma, Adv. For State For Complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sanjay Gangwar, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 31/10/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 131/2025 registered at Police Station Pisangan District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1), 238(a), 61(2) of the BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is a female having two children aged 5 and 7 years. It is submitted that the applicant has been in custody ever since 26.08.2025 and is alleged to have committed offence of adultery. It is further submitted that the FIR was initially lodged for the offence of murder but was subsequently converted to abetment of suicide. It is also submitted that the applicant has no criminal [2025:RJ-JP:43720] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13123/2025] antecedents and that she is ought to be released on bail, as the trial is likely to take a long time. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. It is further submitted by the counsel for the complainant that the challan has already been filed and the applicant herein has liberty to file a protest petition. It is further submitted that the present is a case of love jihad, wherein two persons from different faiths have united and caused the alleged offence under dubious circumstances. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the allegations leveled herein are heinous in nature; that there are disputed questions of facts and dubiousness which can only be clarified upon trial and after looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. 6. The instant bail application is accordingly, dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /152