APHC010033312019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1545 Between: K L Narsappa The State of A.P and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:- The instant Writ Petition is filed India for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner 04.02.2019 for change of category from BC Anganwadi Wroker in respect of Nallannapally Village Ananthapur District, illegal IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1545 OF 2019 AND and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR REVENUE (AP) GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) following: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 in not considering the representation of the petitioner 2019 for change of category from BC-A to BC-B for the post of Mini Anganwadi Wroker in respect of Nallannapally Village, Gorantla Mandal illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) under Article 226 of the Constitution of declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated B for the post of Mini Gorantla Mandal, tion of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.3 and 4 to consider the representation dt 04.02.2019 and pass such other orders”. 2. Heard Sri K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Child Development and Family Welfare for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents have not followed the percentage of reservation implemented in the Notification issued for the post of Mini Anganwadi Worker by allotting category BC-A woman. Learned counsel would further submit that BC-A category men or women are not available in the division, which is a Unit as per roster of reservation system. A representation dated 04.02.2019 has submitted by the petitioner to convert BC-A category to BC-B category for the post of Mini Anganwadi Worker, but the respondents 3 and 4 have not considered the representation and it is still pending. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Child Development and Family Welfare for the respondents would submit that the counter would show that BC-A people are available in the division. Hence, question of convertion of BC-A to BC-B does not arise. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Writ Petition may be disposed of by giving a direction to the respondents to consider the representation, according to law. 6. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent authorities are directed to dispose of the representation dated 04.02.2019 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.03.2025 KK