Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44767 (KAR)

SMT SULOCHANA W/O VEERABHADRAPPA CHINIWALAR v. SRI VISHNU S/O LATE MANJUNATH KELOJI

WP/104923/2022 · 2025-03-10

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4483 WP No. 104923 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 104923 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. SULOCHANA W/O VEERABHADRAPPA CHINIWALAR, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE DOCTOR AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. “SHUSHRUSHA NURSING HOME”, L.G.ROAD, GANGAVATHI, KOPPAL DISTRICT, KOPPAL-583 231. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA TATA BANGI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. VISHNU S/O LATE MANJUNATH KELOJI, AGE. 22 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. “VENKATESHWARA NILAYA”, H.NO.2-18-149/2-12-87, NEAR BASAVESHWAR OIL MILL, OPPOSITE TO APMC 1ST GATE, ISLAMPUR, GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL, KOPPAL-583 231. 2. SRI. KIRAN S/O LATE MANJUNATH KELOJI, AGE. 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. “VENKATESHWARA NILAYA”, H.NO.2-18-149/2-12-87, NEAR BASAVESHWAR OIL MILL, OPPOSITE TO APMC 1ST GATE, ISLAMPUR, GANGAVATHI, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4483 WP No. 104923 of 2022 DIST: KOPPAL, KOPPAL-583 231. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.N.GULARADDI., ADVOCATE FOR R1-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Mrutyunjaya Tata Bangi., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.H.N.Gularaddi., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4483 WP No. 104923 of 2022 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE CLK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3