Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4476 (RAJ)

NAVED AKHTAR BHATI SON OF SHRI ANSAR HUSSAIN BHATI v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/1116/2025 · 2025-02-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1116/2025 Naved Akhtar Bhati Son Of Shri Ansar Hussain Bhati, aged about 38 years, R/o House No.266, Rita silai Machine ke pass, Ladpura, Kota city Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagr, Jaipur (Rajasthan) through its Managing Director 2. Secretary (Administration), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Chief Personnel officer, Jaipur vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Superintending Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut vitran Nigam Limited, Kota (Raj.) 5. Executive Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut vitran Nigam Limited, Kota (Raj.) 6. Assistant Engineer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 03/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file representation for redressal of his grievances before the respondent No.3/Competent Authority. Considering the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court directs respondent No.3/ Competent Authority to consider the representation within a period of 15 days from date of filing the same, and adjudicate the same by way of a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. In light of above, the present petition disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /162