[2025:RJ-JP:49230] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18630/2025 Bhanwar Lal Bunkar S/o Chunni Lal Bunkar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Rajawas, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Electoral Officer, State Election Commission, Secretariat, Jaipur, 302007 2. The Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Electoral Officer, (Collector), Bhim, Rajsamand, Rajasthan. 4. The Electoral Registration Officer Cum Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bhim, Rajsamand, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivatma Kumar Tank Mr. Aditya Bhatt Ms. Neha Tank For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “a. Issue a writ, order, or direction setting aside the impugned order dated 11.11.2025, issued by the Electoral Registration Officer, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Bhim, Rajasamand and direct the Respondents to remove the Petitioners name from the Booth Level Officer (BLO) list and relieve the petitioner from the additional charge of Booth Level Officer (BLO) forthwith. b. Declare the assignment of the Petitioner as BLO as arbitrary, violative of Election Commission guidelines, and unconstitutional under Articles 21 and 21A. c. Direct the Respondents to ensure compliance with Election Commission guidelines and formulate policies to prevent the overburdening of teachers with non-educational duties. [2025:RJ-JP:49230] (2 of 3) [CW-18630/2025] d. Issue any other direction or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to safeguard the interests of the Petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is decided by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and present writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. 3. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors (supra), Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) and Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh (supra). After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the [2025:RJ-JP:49230] (3 of 3) [CW-18630/2025] decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner(s) is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/79