MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED v. ARM ACCRO MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED
CS(COMM)/244/2024 · 2025-02-10
Mini Pushkarna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44758 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44758 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 244/2024, I.A. 2755/2025, I.A. 2756/2025, I.A.
2757/2025 & I.A. 2758/2025
MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED
.....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Saumya Bajpai and Ms. Pranjal, Advs.
M: 8826576220
Email: delhi@daswaniandaswani.com
versus
ARM ACCRO MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Ashu Bhatia, Adv.
M: 9350152640
Email: ashutoshbhatiaassociates@gmail.com
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
%
10.02.2025 O R D E R
1. The present suit has been filed seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant and all those acting for and on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, marketing or dealing with medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations under the mark ‘BROZIDKIND’ or any other trademark/ trade name with word element ‘KIND’, amounting to infringement and passing off of the plaintiff’s ‘KIND’ family of marks.
2. Grievance of the plaintiff is against the defendant’s use of the mark ‘BROZIKIND’, which is deceptively similar to the ‘KIND’ family of the plaintiff’s marks and also, use of a trade dress deceptively similar to the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:57:40
plaintiff’s product, under the mark, ‘ASTHAKIND’.
3. When the matter was listed on the last date of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the defendant had stated that the defendant had already stopped its business and was no longer manufacturing the products.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the defendant had further submitted that the defendant was ready to suffer a decree, in case the plaintiff gave up its prayer for cost and damages.
5. Today, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that she has taken instructions that the suit can be decreed in favour of the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff gives up its prayer for cost and damages.
6. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant in terms of paragraph 37 (a) to (c) of the plaint.
7. Let decree sheet be drawn up.
8. The present suit, along with the pending applications, stands disposed of.
9. The next date of hearing, i.e., 02nd
April, 2025, stands cancelled.
MINI PUSHKARNA, J FEBRUARY 10, 2025/kr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 10:57:40