IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12995 OF 2023 Between: I. ChittiboyinaSeenaiah, S/o.Pedda Venkaiah Aged about 55 Years, R/o.Akkacheruvupadu, Ambapuram Ogurupadu, Andhrakesari Nagar, Nellore, S.P.S.R Nellore District, A.P-524004 2. Dasari Ramaiah, S/o.Adaiah, Aged about 70 Years, R/o.Akkacheruvupadu, Ambapuram _ __ : ^ ^ U rU p a vj u 5 11 Li 111 cl K C d 1 I ; N a ^ ci i , i i -c., S.P.S.R Nellore District, A.P-524004 3.Chittiboyina Adi Seshayya, S/o.C.Pedda Venkaiah(Late) Aged about 67 Years, R/o.Akkacheruvupadu, Ambapuram Ogurupadu, Andhrakesari Nagar, Nellore, S.P.S.R Nellore District, A.P-524004 .. .Petitioners And 1 .The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat. Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, Nellore District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nellore. 4. The Tahsildar, Nellore Mandal, Nellore District 5. The Nellore Urban Development Authority(NUDA) Represented by its Vice Qhairperson, Nellore, A.P 6. The Nellore Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Municipal Commissioner Nellore. A.P 7. YekolluVenku Reddy, S/o. Malla Reddy, R/o.Ogurupadu Village, Nellore Rural Mandal S.P.S.R Nellore District, A.P- 524004 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in^the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issup a-Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the inaction of the Respondent No's. 2 to herein ih'tak'ihg action against the 7^'^ Respondent in trying to form a Layout and salienate the Government lands situated in S.No's.1 to 54 of an extent of Ac.40.00 Cents of Akkacheruvupadu Village, S.P.S.R Nellore District, A.P allotted to the Petitioners herein, by illegally encroaching the same, without obtaining necessary approval from the Respondents herein as wholly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, untenable, unconstitutional, contrary to the-prdvisions of 'Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer^)'Aa,' l977'. 'Andhra Pradesh Metropolitan Region and Urban Developnienf A^ Act, 2016', violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No's.2 to 6 herein td'fhitiate action against the 7*^ Respondent in accordance with law. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section- CPC / i is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directthe Respondents herein to take appropriate action against the 7'^ Respondent-herein for forming a Layout and trying to alienate the Government lands situated in S.No's.1 to 54 of an extent of Ac.40.00 Cents of AkkacheruVbpad^ S.P.S.R Nellore District, A.P, allotted to the Petitioners herein!’ ' Counsel for the Petitioners: SRi N SAl PHANINDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents Nb l tb 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5 & 6: SRI KOMMASANI SRINIVASULA REDDY SC FOR URBAN DEVELbPMENT AUTHORITIES The Court made the fbllowin^f: / / APHC010246512023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) QMS [3329] :v= WEDNESDAY. THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO; 12995/2023 Between; ...PETITIONER(S) Chittiboyinaseenaiah, and Others AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1.N SAI PHANINDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.KOMMASANI SRINIVASULA REDDY SC FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES The Court made the following; 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12995/2023 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri N. Sai Phanindra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed a memo in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 One CC to SRI N SAI PHANINDRA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. one CC to IrI KOMMASANI SRINIVASULA REDDY SC FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES [OPUC] „ j h 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER OF ANDW^^ WP.No.12995 of 2023 g 26 SEP 2025 ^ Current Secuon mi Co THE WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS