IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10608 OF 2018 Between: Dommarapati (Ramineni) Jyothi, W/o Late D.Bhaskar, d/o Late Muniratnam Naidu, Hindu, aged about 37 years, r/o.H.No. 13-8-78 Thattaiah Gunta Street, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, State of Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. Bank of Baroda, rep. by its Managing Director Baroda Bhavan R C Dutt Road, Alkapuri, Baroda - 390007. 2. Bank of Baroda, rep. by its Deputy General Manager 3-6-262/6, 3rd Floor, Tirumala Estates, Old MLA Quarters Road Hyderabad. Telangana 500029. Himayatnagar 3. Bank of Baroda, Regional Office ^ '’®P- Py its Deputy General Manager, CBM Compound, VIP Rd, CBM Compound, Asilmetta Andhra Pradesh 530003. Visakhapatnam. 4. Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, rep. by its Asst. General Manager Gudavallivari Street, Kamraj Building, Governorpet, Vijayawada Pradesh 520002. ^®P- by its Senior Branch Manager 15-3.481/B, Mosque Road, Tirupathi-517501. Chittoor District. , Andhra ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in terminating/discontinuing the services of the petitioner as Sweeper-cum- Sub-Staff on temporary basis under the 5th respondent, without issuing any notice of termination but abruptly from 09-02-2018 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional in violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and against to the Principles of Natural Justice, by consequently directing the respondents to continue the services of petitioner as Sweeper-cum-Sub- Staff under the 5th respondent on permanent basis by regularizing her services as a regular employee. may lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass Interim Orders directing the respondents to continue the services of petitioner as Sweeper-cum-Sub-Staff under the 5th respondent, until further orders of this Honorable Court pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2018 1. Bank of Baroda, rep. by its Managing Director Baroda Bhavan, R C Dutt Road, Alkapuri, Baroda - 390007. 2. Bank of Baroda, rep. by its Deputy General Manager 3-6-262/6, 3rd Floor, Tirumala Estates, Old MLA Quarters Road, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. Telangana 500029. 3. Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, rep. by its Deputy General Manager, CBM Compound, VIP Rd, CBM Compound, Asilmetta, Visakhapatnam. Andhra Pradesh 530003. 4. Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, rep. by its Asst. General Manager, Gudavallivari Street, Kamraj Building, Governorpet, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520002. 5. Bank of Baroda, Tirupathi Branch, rep. by its Senior Branch Manager, 15-3-481/B, Mosque Road, Tirupathi-517501. Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND Dommarapati (Ramineni) Jyothi, W/o Late D.Bhaskar, d/o Late Muniratnam Naidu, Hindu, aged about 37 years, r/o.H.No.13-8-78, Thattaiah Gunta Street, Tirupathi, Chittoor District, State of Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in lA No. 1/2018 in WP No. 10608 of 2018 dt. 02.04.2018 and consequentially dismiss the writ petition. lA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass Interim Orders directing the respondents to continue the services of petitioner as Sweeper-cum-Sub-Staff under the 5th respondent, as per the Interim Orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No. 15681 of 2018, dt.27.04.2018, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T S VENKATARAMANA The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010233512018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10608/2018 Between: Dommarapati (ramineni) Jyothi ...PETITIONER AND Bank Of Baroda and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.TS VENKATARAMANA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “ to issue a writ or order or direction more particulariy one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in terminating/ discontinuing the services of the petitioner as Sweeper-cum-Sub-Staff on temporary basis under the respondent, without issuing any notice of termination but abruptly from 09-02-2018 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional in violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and against to the Principles of Natural Justice, by consequently directing the respondents to continue the services of petitioner as Sweeper-cum-Sub-Staff under the 5 th 2 respondent on permanent basis by regularizina employee, and pass such other order ^ her services as a regular or orders 2. Heard Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned T.S.Venkata Ramana, learned Standing Counsel counsel for the petitioner and Sri for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner orders dated 02.04.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018, the 4»' consider the representation of the in accordance with law. within a copy of the order. So, far, this order i would submit that by virtue of interim respondent is directed to petitioner dated 13.03.2018 to take a period of one week from the date of is not complied. action. receipt of 4. Learned Standing Counsel for per the instructions received from present, they could not find the let there be a direction to representation is served Learned Standing Counsel not working in the bank. She worked from the respondent-bank would submit the bank, the people who that as are working at copy of the representation of the petitioner and consider her representation sisince the copy of the on the counsel after filing the present writ petition. would further submit that the present petitioner is 01.03.2008 to 09.02.2018. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court appropriate orders giving direction to respondent No.4 representation of the petitioner, according to law. may pass to consider the 6. Considering the submissions reiterating the interim order made, this Writ Petition is disposed of passed by this Court directing respondent Nos.4 3 and 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.03.2018 and take appropriate decision according to governing rules and iaw. There shail be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. assistai^egisjrar^ SECTIONDFFICER ./ //TRUE COPY/ / To, 1. The Managing Director, Bank of Baroda Road, Alkapuri, Baroda - 390007. 2. The Deputy General Manager Bank of Baroda Tirumala Estates, Old MLA Quarters Road, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad. Telangana 500029. Baroda Bhavan, R C Dutt 3-6-262/6, 3rd Floor, 3. The Deputy General Manager, Bank of Baroda Regional Office, CBM Compound, VIP Rd, CBM Compound, Asilmetta, Visakhapatnam. Andhra Pradesh 530003. 4. The Asst. General Manager, Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, Gudavallivari Street, Kamraj Building, Governorpet, Vijayawada Pradesh 520002. 5. The Senior Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Tirupathi 481/B, Mosque Road, Tirupathi-517501. Chittoor District. 6. One CC to Sri. P Rajesh Babu Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri. T S Venkataramana Advocate [OPUC] 8. Three CD Copies , Andhra Branch, 15-3- GSC HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10608 of 2018 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS