[2025:RJ-JP:19135] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1273/2014 Sheela Rani W/o Shri Surendra Kumar, R/o H.no. 1-Cha-10, Dadabari, Kota. ----Appellant Versus 1. Smt. Usha Devi Sureka, W/o Shri Vinod Kumar Sureka, R/o H.no. 1-Cha-29, Dadabari, Kota Raj. 2. Smt. Sangeeta Devi Sureka W/o Shri Shivkumar Sureka, R/o H.no. 1-Cha-29, Dadabari, Kota Raj. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Smt. Usha Devi Sureka, W/o Shri Vinod Kuamr Sureka, By Caste Mahajan, R/o H.no. 1- Cha-29, Dadabari, Kota Raj. 3. Smt. Meera Devi Sureka W/o Shri Ramavtar Sureka, R/o H.no. 1-Cha-29, Dadabari, Kota Raj. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Smt. Usha Devi Sureka, W/o Shri Vinod Kuamr Sureka, R/o H.no. 1-Cha-29, Dadabari, Kota Raj. 4. Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Branch Dadabari, Kota Through Manager. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Rathore, Mr. Lokesh Taylor on behalf of Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 06/05/2025 The present miscellaneous appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of CPC was preferred by the plaintiff-appellant against the dismissal of the Temporary Injunction (TI) Application. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that original suit itself has been decreed on [2025:RJ-JP:19135] (2 of 2) [CMA-1273/2014] 11.09.2024, therefore, the present miscellaneous appeal has become infructuous. In view of the fact stated hereinabove, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/86