[2025:RJ-JP:44701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13879/2025 Kalli S/o Kedar, R/o Village Dhondh Police Station Aangai District Dholpur (Presently Accused Petitioner In Judicial Custody In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 07/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 325/2015 registered at Police Station Mania District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 399, 402 IPC, Section 3/25 Arms Act and Section 11 of Rajasthan Dacoity Affected Areas Act, 1986. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that applicant is in custody ever since 10.10.2025. 3. It is submitted that it is an admitted fact that the applicant at a prior occasion has jumped the bail, by not marking presence before the learned Trial Court however, in this regard, for consideration of the present matter, ratios opined in SBCRLMB No. 2371/2020 titled as Kuldeep Singh Vs. State of Raj. and SBCRLMB No. 8977/2022 titled as Husain Khan & Anr. Vs. State of Raj., ought to be considered. It is assured that the applicant shall not make an attempt to jump the bail again. [2025:RJ-JP:44701] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13879/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that six years is longer period and there are all apprehensions that applicant will run away again and strict directions be passed, if bail is allowed. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that it is assured that the applicant shall now onward regularly appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date of hearing, as fixed and directed by the Court concerned, and not jump the bail again; that applicant is in custody ever-since 10.10.2025; that the applicant is willing and ready to abide with the conditions so imposed, and taking note of the overall facts and circumstances, and relying upon the ratio encapsulated in SBCRLMB No. 2371/2020 (Supra) and SBCRLMB No. 8977/2022 (Supra), but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. Howsoever, it is directed that it be ensured that the applicant shall not jump the bail again. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Kalli S/o Kedar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- additionally deposit a cost of Rs. 25,000/- in favour of Rajasthan Police Benevolent Fund; and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /140