Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44737 (RAJ)

BUDDHIPRAKASH SHARMA S/O SHRI GOPAL LAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16201/2025 · 2025-10-29

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16201/2025 Buddhiprakash Sharma S/o Shri Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Post Khareda, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Services (Gr.iii) Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C- Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 3. The Additional Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 4. The Project Direcctor (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 5. The Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Health Services Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur 6. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Tonk District Tonk Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC with Ms. Sweekriti Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 29/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:43335] (2 of 3) [CW-16201/2025] “a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioner in light of Order dated 15.9.2025 and give appointment to petitioner as GNM in pursuance to the Advertisement dated 4.5.2007 with all consequential benefits. b) Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors. on 15.09.2025. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with judgment dated 19.12.2018, affirmed on 15.09.2025. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 and partly modified on dated 15.09.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal [2025:RJ-JP:43335] (3 of 3) [CW-16201/2025] Writ No.414/2019 by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/14