"V [3504 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10315 OF 2016 Between: Executive Director, BHEL"- Heavy Plates & Vessels Plant (Formerly BHPV) Visakhapatnam ...PETITIONER/S AND 1. Controlling Authority urine Payment Gratuity Act 1972, & Regionall Labour Commissioner (Central); Visakhapatnam 2. Sri P.Sreerama Murthy, D.No.2-25-16/4, Gurunadha Rao Residency Mindi, BHPV (PO), Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT/S Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or a direction or a Writ more particularly one in the nature of Certiorari after calling for records from the Respondent and quash the order in Gratuity Application No.6 of 2014 dated 11-1-2016. LA. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO! 13005 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspehd the operation of order in Gratuity Application No.6 of 2014 dated 11-1-2016 during the pendency Petition of Writ Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. S RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondents: DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA ! w'-i‘ The Court made the following: APHC010807412016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10315/2016 Between; Executive Director ...PETITIONER AND Controlling Authority Urine Payment Gratuity Act 1972 and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not available on the earlier occasions i.e., 04.02.2025, 21.03.2025 and even today also. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for prosecution. 2. non- 2 There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT I^GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. S RAVINDRANATH Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. DEPUTY SOLICITORGENERAL OF INDIA Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:28/03/2025 ORDER yVP.No.10315of 2016 5 22SEPa>?5 m, 43^/ . Currsni seciion , :5;5;^SPaTCH^? DISMISSED THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS