- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6052 WP No. 102102 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102102 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: RAJU S/O MARUTI SURYAVANSHI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O BAGALKOT, NOW AT EWS 139, JAYANAGAR, HUDCO COLONY, VIJAYAPURA-560 041. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH.S.MAIGUR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER (R AND R), UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT (UKP), NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587 101. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BTDA), NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587 101. 3. THE REHABILITATION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BTDA), NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. G.K.HIREGOUDAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6052 WP No. 102102 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Harish S.Maigur., counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Kirtilata.R.Patil., HCGP for respondent No.1 and Sri.G.K.Hiregoudar., counsel for respondents 2 and 3 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated:27.02.2024 vide Annexure-D. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated:27.02.2024 vide Annexure-D. Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6052 WP No. 102102 of 2025 5. A Mandamus is ordered directing respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation dated:27.02.2024 vide Annexure-D in accordance with the law, within six weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59