[2025:RJ-JP:44488] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16082/2024 1. Neha Bumb W/o Shri Mohit Kumar Bumb, R/o 104, Sbc Apartment, Lalarpura Road, Gandhi Path West, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Tara Chand Jain, R/o 104, Sbc Apartment, Lalarpura Road, Gandhi Path West, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain with Mr. Avinash Dhanju For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, CI, SHO, Bassi, Jaipur present in person Mr. Abhishek Sharma with Mr. Sharvan Saini HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 06/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 363/2024 registered at Police Station Bassi (Jaipur City East), District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the parties, on a mutual consensus, submitted that the instant anticipatory bail application may be allowed, subject to the condition that the balance amount to the tune ₹86 lakhs, which remains unpaid as on date, shall be paid within a period of next three months starting from the date of this [2025:RJ-JP:44488] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16082/2024] order. Additionally, learned counsel for the accused-applicants has given an undertaking that the applicants shall pay a sum, amounting to ₹10 lakhs within a period of next three days, and the remaining amount shall be paid within the next three months, as directed. It is further agreed between the parties that if all the above-mentioned conditions are fulfilled by the applicants within the specified period, all the proceedings, civil and criminal qua the said amount shall be withdrawn. 3. Having heard the submissions of the counsel for the parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the matter at hand, prima facie, it appears that the initial registry was executed for a consideration of ₹88 lakhs. Thereafter, the applicant transferred the aforesaid registry to father in-law and has obtained loan from a bank, to the tune of approximately ₹2.45 Crore. It is thus apparent that there has been intentional suppression of the actual transaction value. Therefore, on the lines of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case titled The Correspondence RBANMS Educational Institution v. B. Gunashekar and anr.: 2025 INSC 490, the matter at hand is accordingly referred to the Income Tax Department for necessary action, in accordance with law. 4. Howsoever, taking note of the consensus drawn inter-se the parties, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Bassi (Jaipur City East), District Jaipur City (East) in F.I.R. No. 363/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Neha Bumb W/o Shri Mohit Kumar Bumb & Anil Kumar Jain S/o Shri Tara Chand Jain shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a [2025:RJ-JP:44488] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16082/2024] personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/255