IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 209 NAVED KHAN No.1187/FBD STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE MR. Present : Mr Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. This LPA assails Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant been dismissed. 2. The issue before the learned Single Judge was as to how the period of suspension has to be dealt with once the dismissal order has b aside/modified by the Higher forum order (Annexure P up. The competent authority 04.12.2024, holding apparently was not placed earlier. Copy of such order has been given to the counsel for the appellant 3. Once t appellant would be to as IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA No. Date of decision: NAVED KHAN No.1187/FBD Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Suresh Kumar Redhu, Advocate for the Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. **** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (oral) This LPA assails the order dated Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant been dismissed. The issue before the learned Single Judge was as to how the period of suspension has to be dealt with once the dismissal order has b aside/modified by the Higher forum. Reliance was placed (Annexure P-8), wherein which such a decision was required to be taken up. The competent authority, in terms of such direction holding that such period “Not apparently was not placed earlier. Copy of such order has been given to the counsel for the appellant-petitioner. Once that being so, the appropriate course available to the appellant would be to assail such order in the appropriate proceedings. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.1170 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.08.2025 …. Appellant …. Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR , Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. order dated 22.01.2025, passed by learned Single Judge, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant-petitioner has The issue before the learned Single Judge was as to how the period of suspension has to be dealt with once the dismissal order has been set- eliance was placed upon the revisional decision was required to be taken direction, has passed an order on spent on duty”. This order apparently was not placed earlier. Copy of such order has been given to the hat being so, the appropriate course available to the appropriate proceedings. passed by learned petitioner has The issue before the learned Single Judge was as to how the - revisional decision was required to be taken has passed an order on . This order apparently was not placed earlier. Copy of such order has been given to the hat being so, the appropriate course available to the Jyoti 2025.08.28 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA No.1170 of 2025 4. In view of such subsequent developments efficacy and is consequently 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. AUGUST 22, 2025 Jyoti-IV LPA No.1170 of 2025 (O&M) In view of such subsequent developments efficacy and is consequently dismissed. The file be Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI (ROHIT KAPOOR , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- In view of such subsequent developments, this Appeal has lost its . The file be consigned to record. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE ROHIT KAPOOR) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No has lost its ) Jyoti 2025.08.28 12:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document