Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44722 (RAJ)

ASHOK KUMAR GURJAR SON OF SHRI RAMJI LAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14749/2025 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47272] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14749/2025 Ashok Kumar Gurjar Son Of Shri Ramji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Village-Leelamanda, Tehsil-Thanagazi, District-Alwar, Presently Residing At Village-Narayanpur, Tehsil- Narayanpur, District-Kotputali-Behror (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary To The Government, Government Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur 2. Commissioner, Directorate Of Women Empowerment And Women And Child Development Department, J-7, Jhalana Institutional Region, Jaipur. 3. President/chairman, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers: “a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to grant notional benefits from the date when the candidates of first select list were offered appointment i.e. dated 18.08.2020.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 08.07.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10044/2024 Priya Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the identical issue is already settled in case of Om Prakash & Ors. Vs. State [2025:RJ-JP:47272] (2 of 2) [CW-14749/2025] of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21214/2017, on the basis of judgment in case of Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3247/2015 relying upon judgment in case of Suman Bai & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Reported as 2009 (1) WLC (Raj) 381. He further submits that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with judgments referred by him. 3. Having considered submissions and also material on record, the instant writ petition is disposed of in light of order passed in case of Hemlata Shrimali (supra) and Suman Bai (supra) and noticed in case of Om Prakash (supra) and Priya Jain (supra), 4. The writ petition is disposed of on the basis of submissions made in the writ petition but respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case of avernments made therein are found to be correct, with applicability of ratio, the petitioners would be entitled to be relief. The entire exercise be completed within 60 days of receipt of copy of the order. 5. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /58