Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44719 (RAJ)

SANTOSH MEENA D/O BHAROSI LAL MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18572/2023 · 2025-11-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48345] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18572/2023 1. Santosh Meena D/o Bharosi Lal Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Dalapura, Post Atewa, Tehsil And District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322243. 2. Rahul Garasiya S/o Laxman Singh Garasiya, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Kharadiwara, Post Thana, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur, Rajasthan- 313804. 3. Raj Kumar Meena S/o Mohan Lal Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ganesh Mandir Ke Samne, Ron, Peepalda Kalan, District Kota, Rajasthan - 325004. 4. Bhavesh Gurjar S/o Mali Ram Gurjar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Dhani Radhon, Pipload Narayan, Post Devipura, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan - 303103. 5. Amit Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Dharmawala Kuwa, Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu- 333307. 6. Mohit Kumar Meena S/o Kajor Mal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Mandha Madani, Via Palsana, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan - 332402. 7. Akshay Mathur S/o Avnesh Kumar Mathur, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 14/46, Mp Colony, District Bikaner, Rajasthan - 334004. 8. Navratan Meena S/o Prahlad Sahay, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Meeno Ka Mohalla, Doongri Khurd, Phulera, Jaipur- 303603. 9. Yuvraj Rathore S/o Yogesh Rathore, Aged About 26 Years, R/o New Colony, Dungarpur, Rajasthan - 314001. 10. Ashish Meena S/o Prem Raj Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Ramsinghpura, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur- 322214. 11. Vivek Panchariya S/o Om Prakash Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Near Hanuman Mandir Ward No. 2, Ugampura, Nokha, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 12. Dhruv Singh S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Chilakhur, Post Angai, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan - 328031 13. Deepali Shukla D/o Praveen Shukla, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 401, Block No. 2, Pragati Nagar, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan - 314001. 14. Rajshekhar Sharma S/o Samander Singh Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 7, Swami Nagar, Bhuwana, Tehsil Badgaon, District Udaipur, Rajasthan - 313001. 15. Surendra Singh S/o Jagdish Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Khamiyad, Via Ratau, Tehsil Ladnu, District Nagaur- 341317. [2025:RJ-JP:48345] (2 of 4) [CW-18572/2023] 16. Sagar Jhurani S/o Naresh Jhurani, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. 22/364, Shivaji Mohalla Nawab Ka Bera, District Ajmer, Rajasthan- 305001. 17. Alka Bai Meena D/o Omprakash Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kalakhana, Post Palanpur, District Karauli, Tehsil Hindaun City- 322234. 18. Dharmendra Kumar Upadhyay S/o Kailash Chandra Upadhyay, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 125, Arjun Nagar, Durgapur, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302018. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Vice-Chancellor, Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “i) the Impugned action of respondent authorities in not declaring and operating the waiting list and not according appointment to humble petitioners on the post of Medical Officer in pursuance to advertisement dated 20.05.2022 and impugned DOP circular dated 27.12.2021 Issued by DOP, may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore the [2025:RJ-JP:48345] (3 of 4) [CW-18572/2023] same may kindly quashed and set aside on this ground alone. ii) The respondents may kindly be directed by issuing writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature thereof:- a) To declare the waiting list and operate the waiting/ reserve list against non-joiners for appointment on the post of Medical Officers in pursuance to advertisement dated 20.05.2022; and b) to give appointment to humble Petitioners on the post of Medical Officers with all consequential benefits in pursuance to the advertisement dated 20.05.2022.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:48345] (4 of 4) [CW-18572/2023] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /231