APHC010309642016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7177 OF 2016 Between: P. Kishore Kumar,, S/o. Seshagiri Rao, aged 60 years, R/o. D.No. 2- 291/A, Kammampadu Village, Nuzeedia Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd, (APSPDCL), Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, Tiruchanur Road, Tirupathi. The Chief General Manager HRD, O/o. Managing Director, The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited (APSPDCL), Tiruchanur Road, Tirupathi. The S.E /Operation, Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Guntur. The Divisional Engineer Operations, Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited (APSPDCL), Narsaraopet, Guntur District. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing terminal benefits due to the petitioner after retirement and further action in not extending annual grade increments to the continuous service of 'i the petitioner, while extending such benefits to similarly situated candidates and further action of the 1st & 2nd respondents in issuing impugned Memo No.CGM/HRD/JS/DGM-DC/PO(DC)/A.4/F.269-GNT-0&M/D.No.286/15, dated 19-02-2015 as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India apart from contrary to the service regulations. i OF 2016(WPMP 9161 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for release of annual increments due to the petitioner without reference to pendency of criminal case, for his continuous service after reinstatement till date of retirement on par with other candidates who were sanctioned with such benefit vide Memo No. CGM/HRD/JS/DGM(DC)/PO(DC)/JPO/D.No.312/15, dated 19-02-2015 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI Y NAGENDRA REPRESENTING SRI V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: / / / / APHC010309642016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7177/701R Between: R Kishore Kumar, ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GVSHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VVSATISH (SCforAPEPDCL) The court made the following ORDER:- The writ petition is filed under article 226 of constitution of India, seeking the following main prayer:- ...RESPONDENT(S) / “declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not releasing terminal benefits due to the petitioner after retirement and further action in not extending annual grade increments to the continuous service of the petitioner, while extending such benefits to similarly situated candidates and further action of the 1st & 2nd respondents CGM/HRD/JS/DGM-DC/P0(DC)/A.4/F.269-GNT-0&M/D. No.286/15, dated 19-02-2015 as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India apart from contrary to the service regulations” in issuing impugned Memo No. 2 When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D. Viswakanth, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri YNagendra, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-Corporation, jointly submit that the petitioner has received all the retirement benefits, including final encashment of balance earned leave. In that regard, a copy of proceedings dated 01.08.2025 issued by the Executive Engineer, APCPDCL to Sri V.V.Satish, learned Standing Counsel is placed before this Court. Making the said submissions, they state that the writ petition renders infructuous, as no further orders are required. 2. 3. Recording the submissions made by both the counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. Sd/- U SRIDEVl assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to Sri. G V Shivaji Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. V V Satish (SC for APEPDCL)[OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies gsc \ HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 \ ORDER WP NO. 7177 OF 2016 c 2 3 GCT 2025 V/.- DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS