Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44710 (AP)

K.Nagababu, v. The Commissioner of Endowments,

WP/29501/2016 · 2025-12-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

MRK,J W.P.No.29501 of 2016 APHC010414382016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29501/2016 Between: 1. K.NAGABABU,, S/O GOPALAKRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT: 46 YEARS, SUPERINTENDENT, SRI BYRAGI MUTT, K.PENTAPADU VILLAGE, PENTAPADU MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, TILAK ROAD, ABIDS, HYDERABAD 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI N S CHAKRADHAR RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT: NOT KNOWN, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI KALLAKURI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, KALLAKURU VILLAGE, KALLA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT 4. SRI B H V S N KISHORE KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT: NOT KNOWN, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT 5. SRI P VISWANADHA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT: NOT KNOWN, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI PARIJATHAGIRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY TEMPLE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL AND POST, W.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): MRK,J W.P.No.29501 of 2016 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1St respondent i.e., Commissioner of Endowments, AP, Hyderabad in not considering the case of the petitioner for placing his name in the list of Superintendents as per his seniority from 01-02-2009 on par with respondents 3 to 5 and discriminating the petitioner in not being considered for further promotions in view of G.O.Ms.No.888, dated 08-12-2000, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, opposed to law and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 36517 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the 1st respondent i.e., the Commissioner of Endowments, AP, Hyderabad to place the name of the petitioner as a Superintendent in the preparation of provisional seniority list from 01-02-2009, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P V S S S RAMA RAO 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 3. SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU MRK,J W.P.No.29501 of 2016 The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.12.2025 Dvs MRK,J W.P.No.29501 of 2016 39 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.29501 of 2016 Date: 24.12.2025 Dvs