Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44708 (RAJ)

PURSHOTTAM S/O HANUMAN PRASAD v. MANOJ KUMAR JHUNJHUNWALA S/O LT. SANTOSH

CSA/326/2023 · 2025-11-04

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 326/2023 Purshottam S/o Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 78 Years, R/o Opposite Library, Tehsil Ramgarh Sethan, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Manoj Kumar Jhunjhunwala S/o Lt. Santosh, R/o Ward No. 13, Ramgarh, Shekhawat, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Ganesh Kumar Jhunjhunwala S/o Lt. Santosh, R/o Ward No. 13, Ramgarh, Shekhawat, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Naresh Kumar Jhunjhunwala S/o Lt. Santosh, R/o Ward No. 13, Ramgarh, Shekhawat, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rohit Rajniwal for Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Asgar Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 04/11/2025 1. Counsel for appellant, having instructions of appellant, states that during course of present second appeal, the suit shop has been vacated by the appellant, hence, he does not want to press this second appeal. 2. In view of above, the present Civil Second Appeal is dismissed as not press. 3. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/41