Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44708 (AP)

KAREDLA CHINNA SAMBASIVA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/10497/2025 · 2025-04-24

Harinath N

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[3457 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE AMARAVATI PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE HARINATH.N . WRIT PETITION NO: 10497 OF 20?/; Between: Karedla Chinna Sambasiva Rao. S/o Lingaiah R/o D.No.16-697, Beside Apji Reddy Hospital, District. , aged about 48 years, Piduguralla, Palnadu ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Palnadu 3. The Inspector of Police District. District. Town Police Station, Piduguralla, Palnadu 4. Erragani Venkateswarlu @ Laddu, S/o Narayana. aged about 46 ,, , , years, Venkateswara Electricals, Pillutia Road, Piduguralla, Palnadu District. 5. Chintala Ajay, S/o Srirarnulu, Electricals, 1-Land Centre, Main Road, aged about 50 years, Panduranga Piduguralla, Palnadu District. 4 6. Gontia Srinivasa Rao @ Panduranga Srinu, S/o Venkateswarlu, Panduranga Electricals, 1-Land Centre, Main Road, Piduguralla, Palnadu District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an^ writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3 respondent and his police personnel in calling the petitioner and his family members to the police station and visiting the petitioners house and interfering with their personal life and liberty, without following the due process of law as illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the 3'^'^ respondent not to harass the petitioner and his family members by calling them to the police station. rd lA NO: 1 OF 2025 V t- Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3^ respondent not to call the petitioner and his family members to the police station without issuing any notice. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRr. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA IRLA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: APHC010206612025 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N \A/PIT PFTITION NO: 10497/2025 IN [3457] SM0 y THE Between; Karedia Chinna Sambasiva Rao ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Of Andhra Pradesh and Others The State Counsel for the Petitioner. 1 .SIVA RAMA KRISHNA IRLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO.10497 OF 2Q2fi ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.3 at the behest of respondent Nos.4 to 6 are disturbing the peace of the petitioner and that they are calling the petitioner to the police station without registration of any crime against the petitioner and the police are also threatening his family members with dire consequences, petitioner and the learned Assistant 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Government Pleader. 3. Considering the same, the respondent No.3 is hereby directed to disturb the peace of the petitioner without following law. With these observations, the writ petition not to the due process of is disposed off. No costs if any, shall stand closed. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAF! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER N. To 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Special Messenger] 2. The Superintendent of Police, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Piduguralla, Palnadu District. Guntur District.[By 4. Erragani Venkateswarlu @ Laddu, S/o Narayana, aged about 46 years, Venkateswara Electricals, Pillutia Road, Piduguralla. Palnadu District. 5. Chintala Ajay, S/o Sriramulu, aged about 50 years, Panduranga Electricals, 1-Land Centre, Main Road, Piduguralla, Palnadu District. 6. Gontia Srinivasa Rao @ Panduranga Srinu, S/o Venkateswarlu, Panduranga Electricals. If-Land Centre Palnadu District.[2 to 6 by RPAD] Wvv : 7. One CC to SRI. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA IRLA Advocate [OPUC] 8. TwoCCsto GP FOR HOME .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. 9. Three CD Copie®p Main Road, Piduguralla [OUT] 0^ HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2025 ORDER o<= ANDA^ g 2 SEP 2025 I . Current Section , !5S5;££SPATC^35^ WP.No.10497 of 2025 THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OFF WITHOUT COSTS