MAHENDRASINGH RAJENDRASINGH DIXIT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, OTHER BACKWARD BAHUJAN WELFARE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS
WP/206/2025 · 2025-10-13
Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Yanshivraj Gopichand Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44704 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44704 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 4. W.P.206.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.206/2025 Mahendrasingh Rajendrasingh Dixit Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Thr. The Secretary Other Backward Bahujan Welfare Deptt., Mumbai and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms. Mansi Saraykar h/f Adv. A. Parchure, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. D.M. Kakan, Advocate for the respondent no. 3. Mr. I. J. Damle, A.P.P. for the respondent/State.
CORAM :
ANIL L. PANSARE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE :
OCTOBER 13, 2025 The learned Counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 submits that the respondents have released the gratuity, leave encashment and difference of suspension allowance as due and payable to petitioner. A pursis to that effect has been placed on record. 2] In view thereof, the purpose of filing petition has been served. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that though payment is received, interest thereon is not received, and seeks liberty to avail remedy as is available in law. 3] The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Shubham 2025:BHC-NAG:10738-DB