Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44701 (ALL)

RATNESH SINGH @ RATNESHEWAR KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/13135/2023 · 2025-09-24

Rajiv Gupta, Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13135 of 2023 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner and as such, no cause of action now survives and the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned A.G.A. for the State does not dispute the aforesaid fact. 4. In view thereof, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 25, 2025 Sachin Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dubey Amit Kumar Devendra Nath, Prabhat Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Manish Kumar (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Ratnesh Singh @ Ratneshewar Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad