Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44696 (ALL)

ANOOP AGARWAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/41620/2013 · 2025-09-21

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 41620 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip has been moved. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 22, 2025 o.k. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pooja Goel, Suman Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Anoop Agarwal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad