Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:49129
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11439 of 2025 1 - Nirmal Soni S/o Late Shri Samaru Soni Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Birbira, Post Office Ganoud, Police Station Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Bishat Nirmalkar S/o Kishun Nirmalkar Aged About 70 Years R/o Ashwani Nagar, Post Office Sunder Nagar, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Manik Ram Sahu S/o Derha Ram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 5, School Para, Arang, Kosamkhunta Post Office Ganoud, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Indal Yadav S/o Tulsi Yadav Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Kachna, Dharsapara, Kachna Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Hari Ram Sahu S/o Lachchhi Ram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Kukra, Post Rewa, Lakhouli, Police Station Mandir Hasoud, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Kumar Yadav S/o Bhagat Yadav Aged About 62 Years R/o Old Rajendra Nagar, Sai Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7 - Arjun Lal Sahu S/o Gopi Ram Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 15, Near Hanuman Mandir, Nimora, Bendri-2, Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Executive Engineer Water Resources Department Raipur Division-1, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Treasury Accounts And Pension Raipur Division, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Khushbu Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.09.26 11:31:43 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 25.09.2025
1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)].
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be
disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika