Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44689 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR S/O JHABARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14535/2025 · 2025-11-10

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44928] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14535/2025 1. Anil Kumar S/o Jhabarmal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Syalodda, P.s. Dabla, Tehsil Patan, District Neemkathana, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) 2. Banshidar S/o Shivdan, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Syalodda, P.s. Dabla, Tehsil Patan, District Neemkathana, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) ----Accused-Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Upendra Singh Rathore with Mr. Krishan Kant Panwar For Non-Applicant(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 169/2022 registered at Police Station Patan, District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 341, 354, 143, 34 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that applicants are aged 24 and 60 years. It is submitted that they are having no criminal antecedents registered against themselves. It is submitted that FIR pertains to the year 2022, and cross FIRs are lodged. It is submitted that opposite side lodged an FIR after a lapse of 15 hours from that of the applicants’. It is submitted that at this stage of trial Section 308 IPC was added, considering the [2025:RJ-JP:44928] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14535/2025] grievous injury on medical opinion. Learned counsel has assured that the applicants are will and ready to abide by conditions, if any imposed. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the facts, taking note of the fact that the matter pertains to registration of cross-FIRs; that no antecedents are reflected against the applicants and without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicants on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants Anil Kumar S/o Jhabarmal & Banshidar S/o Shivdan shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/229