[2025:RJ-JP:47774-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Contempt Petition No. 6/2024 In Ref, R/o ----Petitioner Versus 1. Surendra Aggarwal S/o Kalichanran Aggarwal, Main Bazar, Near SBI Branch, Tijara 30114 Advocate For Accused Sanjay Lamba 2. Sanjay Lamba S/o Mangal Singh Lamba, R/o EG-32, Ashiana Garden Bhiwadi District Khairthal Tijara (Erstwhile District Alwar) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Mathur, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Aditya Kiran Mathur, Adv. Mr. Akhil Simlote, Adv. Mr. Manu Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ram Prasad Sharma, Adv. & Mr. Aayush Goyal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 25/11/2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present contempt petition has been registered on the reference letter being made under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 by the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwadi for initiating the contempt proceedings against Mr. Surendra Aggarwal, Advocate practicing in the trial Court at Tijara and Mr. Sanjay Lamba. [2025:RJ-JP:47774-DB] (2 of 3) [CRLCP-6/2024] 3. On the reference, a detailed replies have been filed by the respondents-contemnors tendering unconditional apology in relation to their conduct as mentioned in reference letter. 4. Learned Senior Counsel submits that there was no intention on the part of the counsel contemnor Mr. Surendra Aggarwal and the question was asked in the true spirit without any intention to lower down the dignity of the Presiding Officer of Court. It is further submitted that even the question asked was also disallowed by the Presiding Officer of the learned Court. Learned Senior Counsel submits that in paragraph 10 whatever has been stated in reference letter is not correct and the same was not uttered by Mr. Surendra Aggarwal, as has been explained in detail while filing reply before this Court. Learned Senior Counsel submits that Mr. Surendra Aggarwal is a very respected counsel of the area concerned coming from the family of lawyers and the misunderstanding happened only in the spirit of arguments during the cross-examination, which took place before the learned trial Court. Learned Senior Counsel submits that Mr. Surendra Aggarwal has never tried to lower down the prestige and esteem of the Court and even if the learned Court felt so, then he undertakes that such incident will be never repeated by him before any Court of law. He, therefore, prays that the contempt proceedings initiated may kindly be dropped. 5. As far as respondent No.2 is concerned, learned counsel Mr. Akhil Simlote submits that he has filed reply and tendered his unconditional apology before this Court. He submits that although, he was present before the trial Court during the proceedings, but he has not said anything. [2025:RJ-JP:47774-DB] (3 of 3) [CRLCP-6/2024] 6. We have considered the submissions made before this Court and we have gone through the reference letter sent by the Presiding Officer, Bhiwadi as well as the replies filed by the contemnors. In view of the unconditional apology tendered by both the contemnors and in view of the fact that Mr. Surendra Aggarwal is a respected counsel of the Tijara Court submitting his undertaking that even if by his conduct, the prestige and esteem of the Court has been lower down, the same shall not be repeated by him in the court proceedings whereever he will be appearing, this Court find it appropriate to drop the contempt proceedings initiated against Mr. Surendra Aggarwal. 7. On the similar lines, counsel for respondent No.2-Mr. Sanjay Lamba also submits that there is no question to lower down the dignity of the Court and he will always rely upon the directions issued by the Court and his conduct will never be of such nature, which will lower down the dignity of the Court. 8. In that view of the matter, we do not propose to continue with the proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act and the same are hereby dropped. 9. Consequently the present criminal contempt petition is dismissed and the notices are discharged. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J Mohita /63