[2025:RJ-JP:47564] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18030/2025 1. Lokendra Nath Sharma S/o Rewati Prasad Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Brahmin Mohalla, Village Pahua, Post Ajau, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Vishnu Prasad Parashar S/o Kalicharan Parashar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Shri Ramchandji Ka Mandir, Hathiya- paur, Tehsil Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 3. Manish Sharma S/o Harshswaroop Sharma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o C-18, Subhash Nagar, Bharatpur, Ra- jasthan. 4. Dheeraj Kumar Gupta S/o Deendayal Gupta, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Jaipur Golden Transport Ke Samne, B Narayan Gate, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Umesh Kumar S/o Kailash Nath, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Vpo Karimpur, Post Puraini, District Dholpur, Ra- jasthan. 6. Ombeer Singh S/o Teekam Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Vpo Manzi, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Ra- jasthan. 7. Prem Prakash Sharma S/o Hari Ram Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Near Warehouse, Nadbai, District Bharat- pur, Rajasthan. 8. Govind Singh Meena S/o Bhajan Lal Meena, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village Sikrauda, Tehsil Hindaun, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 9. Ravindra Singh S/o Shyam Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Vpo Pathena, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Ra- jasthan. 10. Sita Rani D/o Lal Chand, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 21, Jaswant Nagar, Near Rto Office, Laxmi Kunj, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 11. Prabha D/o Chandra Pal Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 77, Surya City, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 12. Hemlata D/o Ghanshyam Das, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 175, Surya City, Sarash Chauraha, Jaipur Agra Highway, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 13. Dharmendra Kumar Agrawal S/o Dinesh Chand, Aged [2025:RJ-JP:47564] (2 of 4) [CW-18030/2025] About 48 Years, R/o Village Bhusawar, Near Nagar Palika Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 4. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Dholpur. 5. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Bharatpur. 6. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Deeg. 7. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education (Headquarter), Jhalawar. 8. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Dholpur 9. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur. 10. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Deeg. 11. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: i. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give seniority and promotion to petitioners as given to the candidates who selected/appointed for the post of Teacher Grade III. [2025:RJ-JP:47564] (3 of 4) [CW-18030/2025] ii. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents may kindly be directed to give same benefit, such as seniority, promotion as has been given to Vinod Kumar Chobisa, who is junior in merit and also give same benefit as given in the case of Mulak Raj Mahawar & Ors. Vs. Prin- cipal Secretary & Ors. (SBCWP No.19970/2017). iii. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioners. iv. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 08.11.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19970/2017: Mulak Raj Mahawar & Ors. vs. The Principal Secretary & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Mulak Raj Mahawar (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still [2025:RJ-JP:47564] (4 of 4) [CW-18030/2025] aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Chandan/211