IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10308 OF 2025 Between: P. Linga Murthy, S/o Ankireddy, 68 years, G.P.A. Holder of N. Narasimha Roddy S/o Muni Reddy R/o Door No. 9-505,Lingeswara Nagar, Sai Nagar Grama Panchayat,Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittonr District ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Guntur District. Secretariat Buildings, The Circle Inspector, Tirupathi Rural PS Tirupathi. The Station House Officer, Tirupathi Rural PS , Tirupathi M. Chakradhar Chowdary, S/o late Kuppiswamy Naidu, Aged 57 years, R/o D.No. 2-59, Road No. 3, M.K. Naidu Colony,Tirupati, Tirupati (Old Chittoor)District 1. 2. 3. 4. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declare that the illegal and unlawful actions of the respondent No.2 and 3.in interfering in civil matters pertains to the property appeal i.e., R.A. 593/2016 at 1®* Additional District and sessions Judge, Mysore, and where my principal of General Power of Attorney who owns owner and possessor of Survey No. 145, 147/1 and 148/2 of Avilala Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh covered in judgment R.A. 593/2016 on the file of the IV Additional T District and sessions Judge, Mysore, under which the respondents 2 and 3 calling the petitioner repeatedly to the police station threatening to register false cases against the petitioner to support the 4th respondent in illegal manner from the unlawful force of respondents 2 and 3 and threatening the petitioner with dire consequences, as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unlawful, without jurisdiction, discriminatory and violative of articles 14, 25, 26 and 300-A of Constitution of India. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"^^ and 3'"^ respondents along with their staff of police not to call the petitioner to the police station, not to interfere into, the property appeal i.e., R.A. 593/2016 at IV Additional District and sessions Judge, Mysore, and where my principal of General Power of Attorney who owns owner and possessor of Survey No. 145, 147/1 and 148/2 of Avilala Village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. MAJJI VENKATA DIVYA HARITHA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4:-- The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010205002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) QMS WM [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10308/2025 Between: P Linga Murthy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.MAJJI VENKATA DIVYA HARITHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10308/2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are calling the petitioner to the police station to settle the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No.4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police also directed the 3'^'* respondent not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondent No.4 and in this regard he also addressed a letter to Superintendent of Police, Tirupati on 09.04.2025 with regard to calling for the petitioner to police by the 3''^ respondent and also his involvement in pending civil disputes pending between the petitioner and the 4*'^ respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Considering the submissions, the respondents 2 and 3 are hereby directed not to disturb the peace of the petitioner and not to interfere with the civil disputes between pending between the petitioner and the 4*" respondent, without following the due process of law. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed off. No costs As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGI^RAR //TRUE COPY// SKrnON OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary , Home Department, State o f Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Secretariat Buildings, 2. The Circle Inspector, Tirupathi Rural PS, Tirupathi. House Officer, Tirupathi Rural PS, Tirupathi 3. The Station 4. One CC to M/s. Majji Venkata Divya Haritha, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:22/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10308 of 2025 to DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS